Ir al contenido
¿Algo pesa en tu conciencia? Compruébalo ahora → Haz la Evaluación de Carga Espiritual →

Contenido basado en textos religiosos primarios y académica reconocida..

Última actualización: 2026-07-24

El chisme en línea: ¿es haram?

Respuesta rápida

Sí, El chisme en línea se considera Haram (prohibido) en el islam.

Sí — Haram (prohibido) Quran 49:12

IsItASin · Última actualización: 2026-07-24

Sí, El chisme en línea se considera Haram (prohibido) en el islam. Quran 49:12 — 'And do not backbite one another. Would one of you like to eat the flesh of his dead brother? You would detest it.'

Lo que el islam enseña sobre El chisme en línea

Según el islam, El chisme en línea se considera Haram (prohibido).

La ghiba (cotilleo) es haram: la imagen del Corán es inolvidable —hablar de las faltas de un hermano a sus espaldas es como comer su carne muerta (49:12)—. Los hilos en línea multiplican los testigos, multiplicando el mal; e incluso los relatos verdaderos están incluidos en la prohibición.

¿Te preguntas qué enseñan otras religiones?

📖

The Study Quran

For questions this important, going back to the source matters. The Study Quran — the definitive English translation with 1,500+ pages of commentary by leading scholars — provides the depth these questions deserve.

Take the Next Step — Understand What Allah Reveals →

Lo que el islam enseña sobre El chisme en línea

Respuesta completa (en inglés) — El análisis detallado a continuación está disponible en inglés. Leer la versión completa en inglés →

Islam's backbiting text is among the most vivid in scripture. Quran 49:12 asks the backbiter whether he would 'like to eat the flesh of his dead brother' — then adds 'you would detest it,' making the natural revulsion the measure of the act. The definition is broad: mentioning anything your brother would dislike, even if true, in his absence; falsehood on top of it is buhtan, slander, and worse. The Prophet described the gossiper's punishment in imagery that ensured the community remembered it, and Surah 104 opens with 'woe to every humazah lumazah' — the slanderer-scandalmonger — as a named category of the doomed. Online, fiqh councils note the aggravating factors: the audience is unlimited, the record is permanent, and anonymity removes the natural shame that restrained the market-place gossip. The Islamic rehabilitation program is also practical: cover others' faults ('whoever covers a believer, Allah will cover him on the Day of Resurrection'), speak good or stay silent — the Prophet's famous summary rule — and leave the thread. Muslim ethicists add the upside: the same networks that spread faults can spread honor, and defending the absent is Islamic chivalry (muru'ah).

Referencias Coránicas

  • Quran 49:12 — 'And do not backbite one another. Would one of you like to eat the flesh of his dead brother? You would detest it.'
  • Quran 104:1 — 'Woe to every backbiter, slanderer.'
  • Quran 24:19 — 'Indeed, those who like that immorality should be spread are for them a painful punishment.'

Qué deberías hacer

El análisis detallado a continuación está disponible en inglés.

  • Before sharing news about someone, ask: is it mine to share, and would they say it in front of me?
  • Exit threads that exist to dissect an absent person; leaving quietly is not rude — staying is.
  • Muslim: Speak good or remain silent; remember the dead-flesh image (49:12) when the morsel looks delicious.
  • All: If you have spread someone's story, correct it where it spread and apologize to the person — repair is required, not optional.
Book of Repentance (Sahih Muslim)

Book of Repentance (Sahih Muslim)

The Prophet (peace be upon him) said Allah rejoices more when you return than a man who finds water in the desert. Islamic tradition holds that tawbah is always accepted for those who sincerely seek it.

Begin Your Tawbah — The Path Is Open →

Preguntas frecuentes

El análisis detallado a continuación está disponible en inglés.

Is sharing a public post about someone still gossip?

Public information weakens the privacy claim but not the harm standard.

Public information weakens the privacy claim but not the harm standard. Traditions still ask about intent and effect — sharing to shame or mock remains wrong even when the source is public. Islam's is about what the subject would dislike.

What if I'm just venting to close friends?

Venting to process pain has a place, but traditions set guardrails: purpose (processing, not entertaining), person (a confidant who can help, not an audience), and content (your experience, not their character).

Venting to process pain has a place, but traditions set guardrails: purpose (processing, not entertaining), person (a confidant who can help, not an audience), and content (your experience, not their character). Islam permits complaint to authorities who can fix wrongs.

Can I warn someone about a genuinely dangerous person?

Yes — protective warning is the classic permitted exception.

Yes — protective warning is the classic permitted exception. Yes — disclosing real danger to those who can act is the permitted exception in each tradition. The rules: be accurate, be necessary, go to people who can help.

Temas relacionados

Aviso: IsItASin.org ofrece resúmenes informativos de enseñanzas religiosas de varias tradiciones. Esto no es asesoramiento religioso. Para orientación espiritual personal, consulta a un líder religioso calificado de tu tradición.

Something deeper?

If you sense there's more behind the questions...

Behold Now →

¿Algo pesa en tu conciencia?

Haz la evaluación honesta ahora.

Comprobar →
📖

This moment matters. A good study Bible helps you go deeper.

The ESV Study Bible — depth that changes lives.

Get It →